diff --git a/articles/deprecated_browsers.html b/articles/deprecated_browsers.html deleted file mode 100644 index 1723fa6..0000000 --- a/articles/deprecated_browsers.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,303 +0,0 @@ - - - - - Comparison between web browsers — Spyware Watchdog - - - - -
- -
-

Comparison between web browsers

-

- This purpose of this article is not to rate each web browser in a - vacuum, like articles on this website that focus on one specific web - browser, but rather to compare all of the web browsers that have been - rated on this website against each other. This is a ranking that is - based on how much Privacy a browser offers by default, as well as, how - much privacy can be gained by configuring it. -

-

Top Tier — Best Privacy

-

- These are all browsers that require a minimal amount of configuration - and can achieve the required level of privacy needed to browse the - modern web- compatibility with a comprehensive suite of - content-blocking extensions that can block spyware providers correctly - and fully. Iridium and Pale Moon both are configured in a way that - leaks user information and thus require additional configuration. -

- -
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Tor Logo - - GNU IceCat Logo - - Ungoogled Chromium Logo - - Iridium Logo - - Pale Moon Logo -
- Tor Browser - - GNU IceCat - - Ungoogled Chromium - - Iridium Browser
Configuration Guide -
- Pale Moon
Configuration Guide -
-

High Tier — Good Privacy

-

- These browsers do not have privacy issues, but they also do not have - enough privacy features to make it to the highest tier. These browsers - both have simple ad-blockers, and do not have any privacy issues, - however, these tools are not as good as the comprehensive privacy - tools that Top Tier browsers offer. -

- -
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
- Otter Browser Logo - - Falkon Logo -
- Otter Browser - - Falkon -
-

Mid Tier — Ok Privacy

-

- These browsers do not have any big privacy flaws, but they also do not - have sufficient privacy protections. Qutebrowser has a very basic - adblocker in it. Both browsers don't have access to extensions either. - So, it's just not enough to be able to browse the modern web - privately, despite the developers not putting spyware into their - browsers. -

- -
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
- Qutebrowser Logo - - SphereLogo -
- Qutebrowser - - Sphere Browser -
-

Low Tier — Poor Privacy

-

- These browsers do not protect your privacy, but they are not in the - lowest tier since they still have something to offer, although, they - should not be used in general. Vivaldi does not let you disable all of - the spyware features, Brave whitelists trackers and has forced - updates, and Firefox and Waterfox are loaded with spyware, to the - point where configuring them is so - non-trivial that you - might as well use a version of Firefox that respects your privacy - by default, rather than diving into the uncertainty of digging - out all of the spyware features (and repeating the process every time - the browser is updated). It's always going to be better to pick a - browser higher on this list. -

- -
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Waterfox Logo - - Brave logo - firefox Logo - - vivaldi Logo - - Dissenter Logo -
- Waterfox Classic - - Brave - - Firefox - - Vivaldi - - Dissenter -
-

Rock Bottom — No Privacy

-

- These browsers are unashamedly designed to collect as much information - about the user as possible (all are rated EXTREMELY HIGH by the site). - Only SRWare Iron has it's source code available, and all the - developers have mistreated their users (complete disregard for privacy - and / or false advertising) for a long time. These browsers are - actively hostile against their users and thus should not be used at - all. -

- -
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- chrome logo - opera logo - SlimJet logo - - WebDiscover logo - Iron logo
- Google Chrome - - Opera - - SlimJet - - WebDiscover - - SRWare Iron -
-
-
- -
- -