SpywareWatchdog/articles/systemd.html

57 lines
3.5 KiB
HTML

<!--Old Style-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html lang=”en-us”>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../style.css">
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Spyware Watchdog</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>systemd</h1>
<p><a href="../articles/index.html">Back to catalog</a></p>
<h1><font color=red>This article is not accurate and needs to be rewritten</font></h1>
<h2>Spyware Level: <font color="yellow">Not Rated</font></h2>
<p>
A lot of people asked me to write this article, so here is my attempt at writing it. Lots of people have lots of reasons to dislike systemd, and a lot of them wonder if
there is also a privacy reason to dislike systemd. But I have not ever heard of any kind of telemetry, phoning home, or any other kind of spyware in the systemd software
suite. systemd is free software so anyone can look at the code. And a lot of people have spent a lot of time cataloging why they don't like systemd. But if you read their
reasons, none of them mention any kind of spyware hiding inside of systemd's codebase that can be actually proven. So, I can't write that systemd is spyware until someone
can prove that it is spyware. If you have proof then feel free to email me and I will be happy to change this rating.
</p>
<p>
This line of reasoning for giving systemd a "Not Spyware" rating has some flaws, and the most obvious one is that it isn't reasonable to audit the 1 million lines of systemd
code for spyware. But this is still too generic of a criticism to make about it, because while in theory it is true, there needs to be real proof. Maybe the take-away is
that while there are many reasons to not like systemd, it's really probably not violating anyone's privacy, just because of how much scrutiny it has gotten. Maybe it should be
rated "Potential Spyware" or a lower, "Probably Not Spyware"? I think that the rating should be taken with a grain of salt because of this.
</p>
<p>
I have personally never used systemd and I don't have the skills to actually audit it or run tests on it myself. So this isn't a very good place to look when looking for reasons
to dislike systemd. At the very least, I can point to anti-systemd web pages that I am sure would be the first to report on systemd potentially violating the privacy of its users.
But I don't want to call them "sources" or anything because what they talk about is beyond the scope of this website.
</p>
<hr>
<h2>Anti systemd web pages</h2>
<p>
<a href="https://suckless.org/sucks/systemd/">systemd is the best example of Suck.</a>
<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180725191931/https://suckless.org/sucks/systemd">[web.archive.org]</a>
<a href="http://archive.li/BfS7l">[archive.is]</a><br>
<a href="http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Arguments_against_systemd">Arguments against systemd</a>
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20180802045154/http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Arguments_against_systemd">[web.archive.org]</a>
<a href="http://archive.li/bnmIo">[archive.is]</a><br>
<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20170724100245/https://muchweb.me/systemd-nsa-attempt/">Is systemd an NSA attempt?</a>
</p>
<hr>
<p><b>
This article was last edited on 8/7/2018
</b></p>
<p>
If you want to edit this article, or contribute your own article(s), visit us at the git repo on <a href="https://codeberg.org/shadow/SpywareWatchdog">Codeberg</a>. All contributions must be licensed under the CC0 license to be accepted.
</p>
<a href="../LICENSE"><img src="../images/cc0.png" alt="CC0 License"></a>
</body>
</html>